Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 50.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 43 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 43 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 6 categories and GPT-5 in 4 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.7 to 38.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 72.1% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 9.9% for GPT-5.
- Both cost about the same: $1.50 input and $9 output per million tokens.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 400K.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | GPT-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 54.1 | 50.9 |
| Released | 2026-05-19 | 2025-08-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 400K |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $9 | $10 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 69 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.1 (#46), GPT-5: 50.7 (#39)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | 73.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | 1417 |
| SciCode | 53.1% | 42.9% |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | 60.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1436 |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | 1,162 |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 65% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 88% |
| GSO | — | 6.9% |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.67 |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5 leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.8 (#107), GPT-5: 33.0 (#53)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 49.6% |
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| GDPval | — | 34.8% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 1.7% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 49.6% |
| BALROG | — | 32.8% |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1133 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 69.6% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.7 (#16), GPT-5: 38.3 (#55)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | 9.9% |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | 56.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | 65.7% |
| CritPt | 13.1% | 12.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | 37% |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | 10.5% |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | 12.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1415 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | 23% |
| DTBench | 94.7% | 90.7% |
| LMCA | 47.1% | 40% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.55 | 150 |
| ForecastBench | 59 | 61.4 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.5 (#30), GPT-5: 54.6 (#36)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | 55.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | 22% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 91.4% |
| ProofBench | 31% | 18% |
| LMArena Math | 1502 | 1406 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | 32.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | 12.5% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 64.7% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 98.1% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#10), GPT-5: 56.5 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | 86.2% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | 50.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1493 | 1420 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 25.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 86.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 14.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 79.2% |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#13), GPT-5: 46.1 (#12)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1311 | 1232 |
| GeoBench | — | 81% |
| VPCT | — | 66% |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.1 (#12), GPT-5: 51.5 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | 1397 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1525 | 1423 |
| LMArena French | 1490 | 1409 |
| LMArena German | 1500 | 1415 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1481 | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | 1453 | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | 1491 | 1406 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1478 | 1398 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.2 (#29), GPT-5: 74.0 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 1388 |
| IFEval | — | 87.5% |
Long Context GPT-5 leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.3 (#39), GPT-5: 69.5 (#2)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1481 | 1399 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#46), GPT-5: 63.5 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | 1406 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1467 | 1365 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1482 | 1426 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 86% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1627 |
| WildBench | — | 85.7% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than GPT-5?
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 50.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5?
Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $9 per million output tokens; GPT-5 lists at $1.25 and $10.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5 better for coding?
GPT-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 49.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-5 share?
43 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 has 69.