Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Sonar Pro

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Sonar Pro does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.2

Rank #32 Confirmed

Sonar Pro Perplexity

—

Unranked

Summary

  • Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $1.50 / $9 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Sonar Pro.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash and Sonar Pro specifications
Gemini 3.5 FlashSonar Pro
ProviderGooglePerplexity
Noometry Index54.2—
Released2026-05-192024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M200K
Max output66K8K
Input $ / M tokens$1.50$3
Output $ / M tokens$9$15
Results tracked541

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), Sonar Pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashSonar Pro
SWE-bench Verified79.3%—
DeepSWE37.4%—
LMArena WebDev1499—
SciCode53.1%—
WeirdML62.6%—
LMArena Coding1492—
ALE-Bench911.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), Sonar Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashSonar Pro
APEX-Agents27.5%—
GBAEval6.7%—
GDP.pdf14%—
LMArena Search—1130
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), Sonar Pro: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashSonar Pro
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
SimpleBench76.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
CritPt13.1%—
Chess Puzzles50%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
EBR-Bench4.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1488—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA47.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.46—
ForecastBench59—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), Sonar Pro: —

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), Sonar Pro: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashSonar Pro
GPQA Diamond92.8%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
LMArena Expert1495—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), Sonar Pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashSonar Pro
LMArena Vision1310—
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), Sonar Pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashSonar Pro
LMArena Non-English1476—
LMArena Chinese1526—
LMArena French1490—
LMArena German1492—
LMArena Japanese1486—
LMArena Korean1451—
LMArena Russian1493—
LMArena Spanish1480—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), Sonar Pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashSonar Pro
LMArena Instruction Following1467—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), Sonar Pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashSonar Pro
LMArena Longer Query1482—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), Sonar Pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashSonar Pro
LMArena Text1482—
LMArena Creative Writing1470—
EQ-Bench 41087—
LMArena Multi-Turn1481—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Sonar Pro?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Sonar Pro does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Sonar Pro?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $9 per million output tokens; Sonar Pro lists at $3 and $15.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Sonar Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Sonar Pro has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper