Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Yi-Large

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.2

Rank #32 Confirmed

Yi-Large 01.AI

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 49.4 to 36.7.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash and Yi-Large specifications
Gemini 3.5 FlashYi-Large
ProviderGoogle01.AI
Noometry Index54.238.1
Released2026-05-192024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$9—
Results tracked543

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), Yi-Large: 36.7 (#203)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-Large
SWE-bench Verified79.3%—
DeepSWE37.4%—
LMArena WebDev1499—
SciCode53.1%—
WeirdML62.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.7%
LMArena Coding1492—
BigCodeBench Complete—47.2%
ALE-Bench911.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), Yi-Large: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-Large
APEX-Agents27.5%—
GBAEval6.7%—
GDP.pdf14%—
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), Yi-Large: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-Large
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
SimpleBench76.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
CritPt13.1%—
Chess Puzzles50%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
EBR-Bench4.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1488—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA47.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.46—
ForecastBench59—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), Yi-Large: —

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), Yi-Large: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-Large
GPQA Diamond92.8%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
LMArena Expert1495—
MMLU—79.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), Yi-Large: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-Large
LMArena Vision1310—
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), Yi-Large: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-Large
LMArena Non-English1476—
LMArena Chinese1526—
LMArena French1490—
LMArena German1492—
LMArena Japanese1486—
LMArena Korean1451—
LMArena Russian1493—
LMArena Spanish1480—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), Yi-Large: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-Large
LMArena Instruction Following1467—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), Yi-Large: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-Large
LMArena Longer Query1482—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), Yi-Large: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-Large
LMArena Text1482—
LMArena Creative Writing1470—
EQ-Bench 41087—
LMArena Multi-Turn1481—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Yi-Large?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Yi-Large better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 36.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Yi-Large share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper