Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Jamba Large

Gemini 3.6 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#33); Jamba Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

54.1

Rank #33 Confirmed

Jamba Large AI21 Labs

33.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 58.8 to 18.0.
  • Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $8 for Jamba Large.
  • Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
  • Jamba Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.6 FlashJamba Large
ProviderGoogleAI21 Labs
Noometry Index54.133.1
Released2026-07-212025-07-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M256K
Max output66K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$2
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$8
Results tracked462

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 50.0 (#48), Jamba Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashJamba Large
DeepSWE46.7%—
FrontierCode34.4%—
LMArena WebDev1538—
SciCode52.7%—
WeirdML56.1%—
LMArena Coding1491—
ALE-Bench715.52—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 32.3 (#65), Jamba Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashJamba Large
APEX-Agents46.9%—
GDP.pdf14%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 58.8 (#22), Jamba Large: 18.0

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashJamba Large
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—26.1%
NYT Connections (extended)89%—
ARC-AGI-191.2%—
CritPt10.6%—
Chess Puzzles43%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1485—
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—
DTBench95.5%—
LMCA44.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.25—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 57.3 (#40), Jamba Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashJamba Large
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)58.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 422%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions70.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.2%—
ProofBench36%—
LMArena Math1505—

Knowledge Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 67.8 (#8), Jamba Large: 37.7

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashJamba Large
GPQA Diamond94.1%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.7%
LMArena Expert1488—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 38.5 (#64), Jamba Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashJamba Large
LMArena Vision1298—
Blueprint-Bench 231.2%—
Furniture Assembly23.3%—
LMArena Document1456—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 56.5 (#19), Jamba Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashJamba Large
LMArena Non-English1469—
LMArena Chinese1531—
LMArena French1504—
LMArena German1478—
LMArena Japanese1476—
LMArena Korean1431—
LMArena Russian1487—
LMArena Spanish1475—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 77.0 (#33), Jamba Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashJamba Large
LMArena Instruction Following1466—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 45.1 (#50), Jamba Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashJamba Large
LMArena Longer Query1474—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 68.2 (#27), Jamba Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashJamba Large
LMArena Text1479—
LMArena Creative Writing1465—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1604—
LMArena Multi-Turn1481—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than Jamba Large?

Gemini 3.6 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#33); Jamba Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Jamba Large?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Jamba Large lists at $2 and $8.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.6 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.6 Flash and Jamba Large share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.6 Flash has 46 scored results on Noometry and Jamba Large has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper