Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Llama 3.2 11B

Gemini 3.6 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#33); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

54.1

Rank #33 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 11B Meta

32.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.2 11B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 38.5 to 24.4.
  • Llama 3.2 11B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.6 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index54.132.1
Released2026-07-212024-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked463

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 50.0 (#48), Llama 3.2 11B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
DeepSWE46.7%—
FrontierCode34.4%—
LMArena WebDev1538—
SciCode52.7%—
WeirdML56.1%—
LMArena Coding1491—
ALE-Bench715.52—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 32.3 (#65), Llama 3.2 11B: 27.3

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
APEX-Agents46.9%—
BALROG—16.8%
GDP.pdf14%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 58.8 (#22), Llama 3.2 11B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)89%—
ARC-AGI-191.2%—
CritPt10.6%—
Chess Puzzles43%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1485—
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—
DTBench95.5%—
LMCA44.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.25—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 57.3 (#40), Llama 3.2 11B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)58.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 422%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions70.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.2%—
ProofBench36%—
LMArena Math1505—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 67.8 (#8), Llama 3.2 11B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
GPQA Diamond94.1%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
LMArena Expert1488—
MMLU—56.5%

Multimodal Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 38.5 (#64), Llama 3.2 11B: 24.4

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Vision1298966
Blueprint-Bench 231.2%—
Furniture Assembly23.3%—
LMArena Document1456—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 56.5 (#19), Llama 3.2 11B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Non-English1469—
LMArena Chinese1531—
LMArena French1504—
LMArena German1478—
LMArena Japanese1476—
LMArena Korean1431—
LMArena Russian1487—
LMArena Spanish1475—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 77.0 (#33), Llama 3.2 11B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Instruction Following1466—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 45.1 (#50), Llama 3.2 11B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Longer Query1474—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 68.2 (#27), Llama 3.2 11B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Text1479—
LMArena Creative Writing1465—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1604—
LMArena Multi-Turn1481—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than Llama 3.2 11B?

Gemini 3.6 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#33); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.6 Flash and Llama 3.2 11B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 3.6 Flash has 46 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 11B has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper