Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 26 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.5

Rank #92 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 21.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 47% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 6% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.09 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashGemma 4 26B A4B IT
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index59.843.5
Released2026-08-132026-04-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output66K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.09
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$0.30
Results tracked4428

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGemma 4 26B A4B IT
LMArena WebDev15921359
SciCode59.8%40%
LMArena Coding14971447
ALE-Bench904.3927.17
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
WeirdML—35.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGemma 4 26B A4B IT
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGemma 4 26B A4B IT
CritPt14.3%0%
Chess Puzzles47%6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14941439
DTBench96.8%74.9%
LMCA50.4%29.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27141.85
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGemma 4 26B A4B IT
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%82.2%
LMArena Math15071470
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGemma 4 26B A4B IT
GPQA Diamond94.8%73.2%
LMArena Expert15081447
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.2%

Multimodal Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGemma 4 26B A4B IT
LMArena Vision13161260
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGemma 4 26B A4B IT
LMArena Non-English14841421
LMArena Chinese15481495
LMArena French15051460
LMArena Russian15161434
LMArena Spanish15031417
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGemma 4 26B A4B IT
LMArena Instruction Following14831420

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGemma 4 26B A4B IT
LMArena Longer Query14921428

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGemma 4 26B A4B IT
LMArena Text14861434
LMArena Creative Writing14901402
EQ-Bench Creative Writing17231305
LMArena Multi-Turn14891441

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT share?

26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper