Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM-4.6V

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.6V costs 3.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

GLM-4.6V Z.ai (Zhipu)

41.3

Rank #137 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.6V in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 27.6.
  • GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 Flash and GLM-4.6V specifications
Gemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.6V
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index59.841.3
Released2026-08-132025-12-08
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M128K
Max output66K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$0.90
Results tracked4412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.6V
LMArena Coding14971390
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), GLM-4.6V: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.6V
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.6V
LMArena Hard Prompts14941368
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), GLM-4.6V: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.6V
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1507—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.6V
LMArena Expert15081371
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—

Multimodal Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.6V
LMArena Vision13161164
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.6V
LMArena Non-English14841359
LMArena Chinese15481425
LMArena Russian15161340
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.6V
LMArena Instruction Following14831352

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.6V
LMArena Longer Query14921358

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.6V
LMArena Text14861377
LMArena Creative Writing14901347
LMArena Multi-Turn14891360
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than GLM-4.6V?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.6V costs 3.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and GLM-4.6V share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper