Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Llama 2-13B

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

Llama 2-13B Meta

29.1

Rank #304 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.1 to 12.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 96.8% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 42.2% for Llama 2-13B.
  • Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-13B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index59.829.1
Released2026-08-132023-07-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4432

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19), Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Coding14991062
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1593—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18), Llama 2-13B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-13B
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12), Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-13B
Chess Puzzles47%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14971051
DTBench96.8%42.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.72105.8
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
LMCA50.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard—58.2%
HellaSwag—80.7%
LAMBADA—76.5%
PIQA—80.8%
WinoGrande—72.8%

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18), Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Math15111065
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
GSM8K—36.9%

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4), Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Expert15081030
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.3%
BoolQ—82.4%
MMLU—55.6%
OpenBookQA—57%
TriviaQA—79.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69), Llama 2-13B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Vision1314—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—
ScienceQA—55.8%

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7), Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Non-English14851024
LMArena Chinese15531001
LMArena French15121043
LMArena German14851009
LMArena Japanese1506894
LMArena Korean1486953
LMArena Russian15191055
LMArena Spanish15071086

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12), Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Instruction Following14861046

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Longer Query14931064

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19), Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-13B
LMArena Text14871085
LMArena Creative Writing14901047
LMArena Multi-Turn14951050
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Llama 2-13B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.7 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Llama 2-13B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper