Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Llama 2-7B

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Llama 2-7B Meta

29.1

Rank #317 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 15.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 47% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 0% for Llama 2-7B.
  • Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-7B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index59.829.1
Released2026-08-132023-07-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4429

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Coding14971002
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Llama 2-7B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-7B
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-7B
Chess Puzzles47%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14941009
Epoch Capabilities Index157.2799.06
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard—39.2%
HellaSwag—77.2%
LAMBADA—73.3%
PIQA—78.8%
WinoGrande—69.2%

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Math15071042
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
GSM8K—16.7%

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Expert15081036
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—45.9%
BoolQ—77.9%
MMLU—45.8%
OpenBookQA—58.6%
TriviaQA—73.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Llama 2-7B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—
ScienceQA—43.1%

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Non-English1484973
LMArena Chinese1548973
LMArena French1505970
LMArena German1498978
LMArena Russian1516995
LMArena Spanish15031007
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Instruction Following14831006

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Longer Query1492999

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 2-7B
LMArena Text14861053
LMArena Creative Writing14901033
LMArena Multi-Turn14891029
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Llama 2-7B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Llama 2-7B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper