Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Phi-2

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#14); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Phi-2 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Phi-2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Phi-2 specifications
Gemini 3.7 FlashPhi-2
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index59.8—
Released2026-08-132023-12-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4411

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Phi-2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPhi-2
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
LMArena Coding1497—
ALE-Bench904.3—
HumanEval+—45.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Phi-2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPhi-2
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Phi-2: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPhi-2
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27107.94
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1494—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Adversarial NLI—42.5%
BIG-Bench Hard—59.4%
HellaSwag—53.6%
WinoGrande—54.7%

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Phi-2: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPhi-2
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1507—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Phi-2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPhi-2
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—75.9%
MMLU—58.4%
OpenBookQA—73.6%
TriviaQA—45.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Phi-2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPhi-2
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Phi-2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPhi-2
LMArena Non-English1484—
LMArena Chinese1548—
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Russian1516—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Phi-2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPhi-2
LMArena Instruction Following1483—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Phi-2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPhi-2
LMArena Longer Query1492—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Phi-2: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPhi-2
LMArena Text1486—
LMArena Creative Writing1490—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
LMArena Multi-Turn1489—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Phi-2?

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#14); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Phi-2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper