Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Pixtral Large

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Pixtral Large Mistral AI

32.2

Rank #259 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Pixtral Large in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 21.7.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashPixtral Large
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index59.832.2
Released2026-08-132024-11-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M128K
Max output66K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$2
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$6
Results tracked443

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Pixtral Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPixtral Large
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
LMArena Coding1497—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Pixtral Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPixtral Large
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPixtral Large
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
EnigmaEval—0.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts1494—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Pixtral Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPixtral Large
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1507—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Pixtral Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPixtral Large
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPixtral Large
LMArena Vision13161089
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Pixtral Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPixtral Large
LMArena Non-English1484—
LMArena Chinese1548—
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Russian1516—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Pixtral Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPixtral Large
LMArena Instruction Following1483—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Pixtral Large: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPixtral Large
LMArena Longer Query1492—

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashPixtral Large
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723988
LMArena Text1486—
LMArena Creative Writing1490—
LMArena Multi-Turn1489—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Pixtral Large?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Pixtral Large?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Pixtral Large share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper