Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3 14B

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 14B costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen3 14B Alibaba (Qwen)

35.5

Rank #225 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3 14B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 18.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 47% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 4% for Qwen3 14B.
  • Qwen3 14B is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 14B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.835.5
Released2026-08-132025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M131K
Max output66K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.35
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$1.40
Results tracked4412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 14B
SciCode59.8%31.6%
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
LMArena Coding1497—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 14B
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41%
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 14B
CritPt14.3%0%
Chess Puzzles47%4%
DTBench96.8%64%
LMCA50.4%18.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27138.23
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.1%
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1494—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%66.4%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1507—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 14B
GPQA Diamond94.8%63.8%
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.4%
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 14B
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 14B
LMArena Non-English1484—
LMArena Chinese1548—
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Russian1516—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1483—

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 14B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.5%
LMArena Longer Query1492—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 14B
LMArena Text1486—
LMArena Creative Writing1490—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
LMArena Multi-Turn1489—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3 14B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 14B costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3 14B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper