Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3 32B

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen3 32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.2

Rank #172 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3 32B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 20.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 47% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 5% for Qwen3 32B.
  • Qwen3 32B is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 32B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.839.2
Released2026-08-132025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M131K
Max output66K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.70
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$2.80
Results tracked4426

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 32B
SciCode59.8%35.4%
LMArena Coding14971358
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
Aider Polyglot—40%
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 32B
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—48.7%
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 32B
CritPt14.3%0.3%
Chess Puzzles47%5%
LMArena Hard Prompts14941334
DTBench96.8%67.5%
LMCA50.4%17.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27138.51
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 32B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%66.9%
LMArena Math15071399
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 32B
GPQA Diamond94.8%65.7%
LMArena Expert15081362
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen3 32B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 32B
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 32B
LMArena Non-English14841317
LMArena Chinese15481357
LMArena German14981341
LMArena Russian15161311
LMArena French1505—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 32B
LMArena Instruction Following14831305

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 32B
LMArena Longer Query14921327
Fiction.LiveBench—74.2%

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 32B
LMArena Text14861340
LMArena Creative Writing14901297
LMArena Multi-Turn14891331
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3 32B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3 32B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper