Model comparison
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash
Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#11); Qwen3.8 Flash does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.8 Flash in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 42.2 to 31.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GDP.pdf: 23.8% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 16.6% for Qwen3.8 Flash.
- Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.47 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 59.8 | 35.1 |
| Released | 2026-08-13 | 2026-08-26 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.75 | $0.47 |
| Results tracked | 44 | 1 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19), Qwen3.8 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 65.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 43.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1593 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 20.3% | — |
| SciCode | 59.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1499 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 904.3 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.7 Flash leads
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18), Qwen3.8 Flash: 31.2
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 23.8% | 16.6% |
| APEX-Agents | 67.8% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12), Qwen3.8 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 94% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 95.5% | — |
| CritPt | 14.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1497 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 37% | — |
| DTBench | 96.8% | — |
| LMCA | 50.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 157.72 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18), Qwen3.8 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 71.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 36.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.2% | — |
| ProofBench | 58% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1511 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4), Qwen3.8 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1508 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69), Qwen3.8 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1314 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7), Qwen3.8 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1485 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1553 | — |
| LMArena French | 1512 | — |
| LMArena German | 1485 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1506 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1486 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1519 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1507 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12), Qwen3.8 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1486 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28), Qwen3.8 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1493 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19), Qwen3.8 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1490 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1723 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1495 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3.8 Flash?
Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#11); Qwen3.8 Flash does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.47 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.8 Flash share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Flash has 1.