Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 5.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

34.3

Rank #232 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 22.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 59.8% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 32.3% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.834.3
Released2026-08-132026-02-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$0.80
Results tracked443

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
SciCode59.8%32.3%
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
WeirdML—34.4%
LMArena Coding1497—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
CritPt14.3%0%
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1494—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1507—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1484—
LMArena Chinese1548—
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Russian1516—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Instruction Following1483—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Longer Query1492—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1486—
LMArena Creative Writing1490—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
LMArena Multi-Turn1489—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 5.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper