Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Plus

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#14); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $5 for Qwen3 Coder Plus.
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.8—
Released2026-08-132025-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$1
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$5
Results tracked441

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
ALE-Bench904.3456.5
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
LMArena Coding1497—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1494—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1507—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Non-English1484—
LMArena Chinese1548—
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Russian1516—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1483—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Longer Query1492—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Text1486—
LMArena Creative Writing1490—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
LMArena Multi-Turn1489—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3 Coder Plus?

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#14); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3 Coder Plus?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Plus lists at $1 and $5.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Plus has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper