Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3 Max

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 28 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.5

Rank #82 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3 Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.1 to 22.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 94% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 30.1% for Qwen3 Max.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3 Max specifications
Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.843.5
Released2026-08-132025-09-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$1.20
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$6
Results tracked4433

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19), Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
LMArena Coding14991456
ALE-Bench904.3370.45
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1593—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18), Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12), Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
NYT Connections (extended)94%30.1%
Chess Puzzles47%4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14971448
Mystery Game Puzzles37%5%
DTBench96.8%82.1%
LMCA50.4%28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.72142.41
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18), Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%73.3%
LMArena Math15111447
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
ProofBench58%—
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
GPQA Diamond94.8%72.6%
SimpleQA Verified69.2%48.7%
LMArena Expert15081457

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69), Qwen3 Max: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
LMArena Vision1314—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7), Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English14851429
LMArena Chinese15531479
LMArena French15121450
LMArena German14851463
LMArena Japanese15061399
LMArena Korean14861397
LMArena Russian15191428
LMArena Spanish15071463

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12), Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following14861420

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
LMArena Longer Query14931439
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19), Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3 Max
LMArena Text14871439
LMArena Creative Writing14901401
LMArena Multi-Turn14951446
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3 Max?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3 Max?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.7 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3 Max share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper