Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs WizardLM-2 8x22B

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#11); WizardLM-2 8x22B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

WizardLM-2 8x22B Microsoft

30.7

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and WizardLM-2 8x22B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 69.8 to 23.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 94.8% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 43.4% for WizardLM-2 8x22B.
  • WizardLM-2 8x22B is cheaper at $0.62 / $0.62 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 66K.
  • WizardLM-2 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 Flash and WizardLM-2 8x22B specifications
Gemini 3.7 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index59.830.7
Released2026-08-132024-04-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M66K
Max output66K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.62
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$0.62
Results tracked442

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1593—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
LMArena Coding1499—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1497—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.72—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18), WizardLM-2 8x22B: 26.8

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1511—
MATH Level 5—25.7%

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4), WizardLM-2 8x22B: 23.3

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
GPQA Diamond94.8%43.4%
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Vision1314—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Non-English1485—
LMArena Chinese1553—
LMArena French1512—
LMArena German1485—
LMArena Japanese1506—
LMArena Korean1486—
LMArena Russian1519—
LMArena Spanish1507—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following1486—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query1493—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Text1487—
LMArena Creative Writing1490—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
LMArena Multi-Turn1495—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than WizardLM-2 8x22B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#11); WizardLM-2 8x22B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or WizardLM-2 8x22B?

WizardLM-2 8x22B is cheaper. It lists at $0.62 per million input tokens and $0.62 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and WizardLM-2 8x22B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and WizardLM-2 8x22B has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper