Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

61.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 28.5.

Side by side

Gemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index61.842.5
Released2026-09-02—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked5013

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding15101390
DeepSWE73.8%—
FrontierCode41.2%—
CursorBench39.6%—
LMArena WebDev1584—
FrontierSWE19.6%—
SciCode56.6%—
WeirdML84.8%—
ALE-Bench1,270—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
APEX-Agents64.3%—
Remote Labor Index5.8%—
GDP.pdf23.4%—
Vending-Bench 25,094—

Reasoning Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts15081399
ARC-AGI-289.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)97.4%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt18.3%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
Mystery Game Puzzles47%—
DTBench95.7%—
LMCA52.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench76.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.71—

Math Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math15281414
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 422%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench48%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert15241395
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
Humanity's Last Exam44.5%—
SimpleQA Verified69.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1314—
Blueprint-Bench 238.6%—
Furniture Assembly31.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English14911395
LMArena Chinese15541425
LMArena Korean14591406
LMArena Russian15151385
LMArena French1498—
LMArena German1493—
LMArena Japanese1502—
LMArena Spanish1485—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following14901374

Long Context Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query15081384

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text14991401
LMArena Creative Writing14921392
LMArena Multi-Turn15011393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1748—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper