Model comparison
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Llama 3.1-405B
Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Llama 3.1-405B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 16.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.9% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 9.7% for Llama 3.1-405B.
- Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | Llama 3.1-405B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 61.8 | 30.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-02 | 2024-07-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.75 | — |
| Results tracked | 50 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15), Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 84.8% | 21.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1510 | 1291 |
| DeepSWE | 73.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 41.2% | — |
| CursorBench | 39.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1584 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 19.6% | — |
| SciCode | 56.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,270 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21), Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 64.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 5.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 7.4% |
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |
| GDP.pdf | 23.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,094 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5), Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1508 | 1269 |
| DTBench | 95.7% | 61.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.71 | 128.75 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | — | 23% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 45% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 18.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 47% | — |
| LMCA | 52.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 76.9% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 82.9% |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.9 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89.2% |
| PIQA | — | 85.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 89.2% |
Math Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28), Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | 9.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1528 | 1281 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 68.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | — |
| ProofBench | 48% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 24.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 49.8% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2), Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | 50.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1524 | 1243 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 17.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 52.2% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 95.3% |
| MMLU | — | 84.5% |
| TriviaQA | — | 82.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45), Llama 3.1-405B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1314 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 31.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5), Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1491 | 1248 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1554 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1498 | 1279 |
| LMArena German | 1493 | 1252 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1502 | 1208 |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | 1184 |
| LMArena Russian | 1515 | 1265 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1485 | 1260 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13), Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1259 |
| IFEval | — | 81.1% |
Long Context Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1508 | 1266 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1499 | 1284 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1492 | 1262 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1748 | 870 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1501 | 1297 |
| WildBench | — | 78.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Llama 3.1-405B?
Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Llama 3.1-405B better for coding?
Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Llama 3.1-405B share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-405B has 42.