Model comparison
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Magistral Medium
Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Magistral Medium in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 8.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 98.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 6.1% for Magistral Medium.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | Magistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 61.8 | 35.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-02 | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.75 | $5 |
| Results tracked | 50 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15), Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 56.6% | 39.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1510 | 1319 |
| DeepSWE | 73.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 41.2% | — |
| CursorBench | 39.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1584 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 19.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 84.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,270 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21), Magistral Medium: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 64.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 5.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 23.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,094 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | 6.1% |
| CritPt | 18.3% | 0.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1508 | 1267 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 47% | — |
| DTBench | 95.7% | — |
| LMCA | 52.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 76.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.71 | — |
Math Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28), Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1528 | 1250 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 68.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 48% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2), Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1524 | 1223 |
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45), Magistral Medium: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1314 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 31.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5), Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1491 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1554 | 1227 |
| LMArena French | 1498 | 1267 |
| LMArena German | 1493 | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1502 | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | 1515 | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1485 | 1271 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13), Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1254 |
Long Context Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1508 | 1295 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15), Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1499 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1492 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1501 | 1275 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1748 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Magistral Medium?
Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Magistral Medium?
Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.
Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Magistral Medium better for coding?
Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.8 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Magistral Medium share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.