Model comparison
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 17.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 97.4% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 12.9% for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 61.8 | 40.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-02 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.75 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 50 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1584 | 1264 |
| LMArena Coding | 1510 | 1461 |
| DeepSWE | 73.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 41.2% | — |
| CursorBench | 39.6% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 19.6% | — |
| SciCode | 56.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 84.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,270 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21), Mistral Medium 3.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 64.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 5.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 23.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,094 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | 12.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1508 | 1436 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.71 | 141.35 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 18.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 47% | — |
| DTBench | 95.7% | — |
| LMCA | 52.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 76.9% | — |
Math Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1528 | 1431 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 68.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 48% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1524 | 1432 |
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.7% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45), Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1314 | 1223 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 31.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1491 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1554 | 1442 |
| LMArena French | 1498 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1493 | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | 1385 |
| LMArena Russian | 1515 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1485 | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1502 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1415 |
Long Context Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1508 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1499 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1492 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1501 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1748 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.
Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?
Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.8 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.