Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen1.5-110B

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

61.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

34.2

Rank #234 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 22.7.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.8 FlashQwen1.5-110B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index61.834.2
Released2026-09-022024-04-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked5020

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding15101184
DeepSWE73.8%—
FrontierCode41.2%—
CursorBench39.6%—
LMArena WebDev1584—
FrontierSWE19.6%—
SciCode56.6%—
WeirdML84.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%
ALE-Bench1,270—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen1.5-110B
APEX-Agents64.3%—
Remote Labor Index5.8%—
GDP.pdf23.4%—
Vending-Bench 25,094—

Reasoning Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts15081168
ARC-AGI-289.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)97.4%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt18.3%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
Mystery Game Puzzles47%—
DTBench95.7%—
LMCA52.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench76.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.71—
ForecastBench—57.7

Math Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math15281185
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 422%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench48%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert15241144
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
Humanity's Last Exam44.5%—
SimpleQA Verified69.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Vision1314—
Blueprint-Bench 238.6%—
Furniture Assembly31.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English14911142
LMArena Chinese15541206
LMArena French14981151
LMArena German14931123
LMArena Japanese15021074
LMArena Korean14591044
LMArena Russian15151118
LMArena Spanish14851142

Instruction Following Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following14901158

Long Context Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query15081157

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text14991175
LMArena Creative Writing14921148
LMArena Multi-Turn15011160
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1748—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen1.5-110B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper