Model comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

61.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 25.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 84.8% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 41.2% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Gemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index61.838.1
Released2026-09-022025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$7.50
Results tracked5025

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena WebDev15841275
WeirdML84.8%41.2%
LMArena Coding15101412
ALE-Bench1,270461.45
DeepSWE73.8%—
FrontierCode41.2%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
CursorBench39.6%—
FrontierSWE19.6%—
SciCode56.6%—
GSO—4.9%
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
APEX-Agents64.3%—
Remote Labor Index5.8%—
GDP.pdf23.4%—
Vending-Bench 25,094—

Reasoning Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts15081372
ARC-AGI-289.2%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
NYT Connections (extended)97.4%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt18.3%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
Mystery Game Puzzles47%—
DTBench95.7%—
LMCA52.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench76.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.71—

Math Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math15281365
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 422%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench48%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert15241338
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
Humanity's Last Exam44.5%—
SimpleQA Verified69.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Vision1314—
Blueprint-Bench 238.6%—
Furniture Assembly31.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English14911346
LMArena Chinese15541357
LMArena French14981398
LMArena German14931325
LMArena Japanese15021310
LMArena Korean14591305
LMArena Russian15151366
LMArena Spanish14851360

Instruction Following Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14901355

Long Context Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query15081378

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text14991357
LMArena Creative Writing14921333
LMArena Multi-Turn15011365
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1748—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.8 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper