Model comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.8 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

61.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 31.1.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.50 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Gemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index61.843.0
Released2026-09-022025-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M131K
Max output66K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.50
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$2
Results tracked5025

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding15101440
DeepSWE73.8%—
FrontierCode41.2%—
CursorBench39.6%—
LMArena WebDev1584—
FrontierSWE19.6%—
SciCode56.6%—
WeirdML84.8%—
ALE-Bench1,270—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
APEX-Agents64.3%—
Remote Labor Index5.8%—
GDP.pdf23.4%—
Vending-Bench 25,094—

Reasoning Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts15081428
ARC-AGI-289.2%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%
NYT Connections (extended)97.4%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt18.3%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
Mystery Game Puzzles47%—
DTBench95.7%—
LMCA52.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench76.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.71—

Math Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Math15281440
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 422%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench48%—
Omni-MATH—46.7%

Knowledge Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Expert15241417
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
Humanity's Last Exam44.5%—
SimpleQA Verified69.7%—
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Vision1314—
Blueprint-Bench 238.6%—
Furniture Assembly31.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English14911407
LMArena Chinese15541460
LMArena French14981413
LMArena German14931417
LMArena Japanese15021395
LMArena Korean14591364
LMArena Russian15151404
LMArena Spanish14851435

Instruction Following Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14901389
IFEval—81%

Long Context Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query15081403
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text14991417
LMArena Creative Writing14921334
LMArena Multi-Turn15011416
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1748—
WildBench—80.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.8 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.8 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 42.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.8 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper