Model comparison

Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.4 to 52.3 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs 5.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 49 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview Google

52.3

Rank #40 Confirmed

GPT-5.4 OpenAI

59.4

Rank #16 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 49 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 1 category and GPT-5.4 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.4 leads 73.5 to 51.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 15% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and 56% for GPT-5.4.
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $15 for GPT-5.4.
  • GPT-5.4 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.05M.

Side by side

Gemini 3 Flash Preview and GPT-5.4 specifications
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGPT-5.4
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index52.359.4
Released2025-12-172026-03-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output66K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$3$15
Results tracked5968

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 50.9 (#42), GPT-5.4: 52.6 (#33)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGPT-5.4
SWE-bench Verified75.4%76.9%
LMArena WebDev14391465
GSO9.8%31.4%
WeirdML61.6%77.7%
LMArena Coding14601497
ALE-Bench1,3671,607
DeepSWE—51.8%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
SWE-bench Multilingual72.7%—
SciCode—56.6%
MirrorCode—15.6%
AlgoTune—1.85

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.7 (#29), GPT-5.4: 46.5 (#13)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGPT-5.4
Terminal-Bench64.3%81.8%
τ²-bench Banking27.3%39.4%
DeepResearch Bench49.8%35.1%
LMArena Search11981197
Vending-Bench 23,6356,144
APEX-Agents—52.4%
τ²-bench Airline82.5%—
τ²-bench Retail76.8%—
τ²-bench Telecom91.2%—
PostTrainBench—19%
BALROG48.1%—
GBAEval—45.1%
GDP.pdf10%—
METR Time Horizons—74.3%

Reasoning GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#37), GPT-5.4: 61.8 (#19)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGPT-5.4
ARC-AGI-233.6%74%
NYT Connections (extended)83.1%91.3%
ARC-AGI-184.7%93.7%
Chess Puzzles40%44%
LMArena Hard Prompts14651485
Mystery Game Puzzles26%37%
DTBench89.1%94.4%
LMCA43.1%52%
Epoch Capabilities Index151.8156.81
ForecastBench58.559.5
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.8%
CritPt—23.4%
EnigmaEval—16%
Thematic Generalization—80%
EBR-Bench—25.4%

Math GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.7 (#55), GPT-5.4: 73.5 (#19)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGPT-5.4
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)51.2%78.6%
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%49%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67.6%83.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%97.8%
ProofBench15%56%
LMArena Math14731488
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)35.6%47.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%27.1%

Knowledge GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#33), GPT-5.4: 65.3 (#14)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGPT-5.4
GPQA Diamond89.4%93.3%
SimpleQA Verified66.8%45.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate13.5%7%
LMArena Expert14621507
Humanity's Last Exam—36.2%

Multimodal Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.5 (#16), GPT-5.4: 43.7 (#20)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGPT-5.4
LMArena Vision12851303
Blueprint-Bench 20%27.1%
LMArena Document14131471
GeoBench88%—
VPCT72.6%—
Furniture Assembly—37.5%

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.7 (#27), GPT-5.4: 56.2 (#23)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGPT-5.4
LMArena Non-English14581465
LMArena Chinese15111519
LMArena French14771493
LMArena German14971472
LMArena Japanese14891485
LMArena Korean14431448
LMArena Russian14801480
LMArena Spanish14691454

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.7 (#56), GPT-5.4: 77.1 (#27)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGPT-5.4
LMArena Instruction Following14371469

Long Context GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#67), GPT-5.4: 50.3 (#8)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGPT-5.4
LMArena Longer Query14521473
CL-bench—27.9%
CL-bench Life—21.7%

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.5 (#45), GPT-5.4: 71.9 (#17)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewGPT-5.4
LMArena Text14661469
LMArena Creative Writing14571439
LMArena Multi-Turn14711482
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840
EQ-Bench 4—1272

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than GPT-5.4?

GPT-5.4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.4 to 52.3 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs 5.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or GPT-5.4?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 lists at $2.50 and $15.

Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or GPT-5.4 better for coding?

GPT-5.4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.6 versus 50.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and GPT-5.4 share?

49 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 has 68.

Related comparisons

Go deeper