Model comparison

Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 28 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview Google

52.3

Rank #33 Confirmed

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

40.9

Rank #134 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 9 categories and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 49.2 to 22.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleBench: 61.1% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and 26.3% for Kimi K2 (Jul 2025).
  • Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper at $0.57 / $2.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) specifications
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index52.340.9
Released2025-12-172025-07-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output66K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.57
Output $ / M tokens$3$2.30
Results tracked5942

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.5 (#35), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%63.4%
GSO9.8%4.9%
WeirdML61.6%42.8%
LMArena Coding14601399
ALE-Bench1,367597.5
SWE-bench Verified75.4%—
Aider Polyglot—59.1%
LMArena WebDev1439—
SWE-bench Multilingual72.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.6 (#27), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Terminal-Bench64.3%35.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—59.1%
τ²-bench Airline82.5%—
τ²-bench Banking27.3%—
τ²-bench Retail76.8%—
τ²-bench Telecom91.2%—
DeepResearch Bench49.8%—
BALROG48.1%—
GDP.pdf10%—
LMArena Search1198—
METR Time Horizons—59.2%
Vending-Bench 23,635—

Reasoning Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#35), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
SimpleBench61.1%26.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14651384
Epoch Capabilities Index151.83146.02
ForecastBench58.560.2
ARC-AGI-233.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—64.4%
NYT Connections (extended)83.1%—
ARC-AGI-184.7%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
Mystery Game Puzzles26%—
DTBench89.1%—
LMCA43.1%—

Math Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.4 (#42), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Math14721396
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)35.6%21.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%0%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)51.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench15%—
Omni-MATH—65.4%

Knowledge Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#30), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Vectara Hallucination Rate13.5%17.9%
LMArena Expert14611363
GPQA Diamond89.4%—
SimpleQA Verified66.8%—
MMLU-Pro—81.9%
Confabulations—20.4%
GPQA (HELM)—65.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.3 (#15), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Vision1285—
GeoBench88%—
VPCT72.6%—
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1413—

Multilingual Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.9 (#26), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Non-English14581372
LMArena Chinese15101416
LMArena French14781379
LMArena German14971386
LMArena Japanese14881349
LMArena Korean14431324
LMArena Russian14801384
LMArena Spanish14701383

Instruction Following Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.8 (#52), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Instruction Following14371347
IFEval—85%

Long Context Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#63), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Longer Query14521353
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—17.6%

Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.6 (#44), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Text14661380
LMArena Creative Writing14571349
LMArena Multi-Turn14711371
Short-Story Creative Writing—85.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1666
WildBench—86.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper. It lists at $0.57 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; Gemini 3 Flash Preview lists at $0.50 and $3.

Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better for coding?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.5 versus 43.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper