Model comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs GLM-4.7

Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 33 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Pro Google

54.8

Rank #28 Confirmed

GLM-4.7 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #124 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 33 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Pro scores higher in 9 categories and GLM-4.7 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Pro leads 52.5 to 24.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Terminal-Bench: 69.4% for Gemini 3 Pro and 33.4% for GLM-4.7.
  • GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3 Pro and GLM-4.7 specifications
Gemini 3 ProGLM-4.7
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index54.842.0
Released2025-11-182025-12-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$2.20
Results tracked6736

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3 Pro leads

Gemini 3 Pro: 51.6 (#39), GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGLM-4.7
LMArena WebDev14401435
LMArena Coding14811454
ALE-Bench1,177399.48
SWE-bench Verified72.9%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)74.2%—
SWE-bench Multilingual68.7%—
SciCode—45.1%
GSO18.6%—
WeirdML69.9%—
AlgoTune1.83—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3 Pro leads

Gemini 3 Pro: 40.6 (#23), GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGLM-4.7
Terminal-Bench69.4%33.4%
Vending-Bench 25,4782,377
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard72.5%—
GDPval40.3%—
Remote Labor Index1.3%—
τ²-bench Airline80.5%—
τ²-bench Banking18%—
τ²-bench Retail75.9%—
τ²-bench Telecom91%—
DeepResearch Bench46.3%—
BALROG58.1%—
LMArena Search1207—
METR Time Horizons71%—

Reasoning Gemini 3 Pro leads

Gemini 3 Pro: 52.5 (#31), GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGLM-4.7
SimpleBench76.4%47.7%
CritPt6.9%1.7%
Chess Puzzles31%6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14801443
Epoch Capabilities Index152.92143.51
ARC-AGI-231.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)94.4%—
ARC-AGI-175%—
EnigmaEval18.2%—
ForecastBench61.2—

Math Gemini 3 Pro leads

Gemini 3 Pro: 49.9 (#59), GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGLM-4.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.4%83.3%
ProofBench20%6%
LMArena Math14761423
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)37.6%2.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)18.8%0%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67%—
Omni-MATH55.5%—

Knowledge Gemini 3 Pro leads

Gemini 3 Pro: 64.4 (#16), GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGLM-4.7
GPQA Diamond92.6%83.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate13.6%11.7%
LMArena Expert14751424
Humanity's Last Exam37.5%—
SimpleQA Verified—32.2%
MMLU-Pro90.3%—
GPQA (HELM)80.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3 Pro: 57.6 (#2), GLM-4.7: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGLM-4.7
LMArena Vision1305—
GeoBench84%—
VPCT91%—
LMArena Document1434—

Multilingual Gemini 3 Pro leads

Gemini 3 Pro: 56.9 (#16), GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGLM-4.7
LMArena Non-English14741417
LMArena Chinese15231495
LMArena French14921432
LMArena German15151424
LMArena Japanese15101439
LMArena Korean14481399
LMArena Russian14931423
LMArena Spanish14701434

Instruction Following Gemini 3 Pro leads

Gemini 3 Pro: 76.3 (#45), GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGLM-4.7
LMArena Instruction Following14581411
IFEval87.7%—

Long Context Gemini 3 Pro leads

Gemini 3 Pro: 44.0 (#79), GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGLM-4.7
CL-bench15.8%15.9%
LMArena Longer Query14711432
CL-bench Life—10.9%

Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Pro leads

Gemini 3 Pro: 66.4 (#35), GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGLM-4.7
LMArena Text14791435
LMArena Creative Writing14821401
EQ-Bench Creative Writing15251413
LMArena Multi-Turn14841446
WildBench85.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3 Pro better than GLM-4.7?

Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3 Pro or GLM-4.7 better for coding?

Gemini 3 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Pro and GLM-4.7 share?

33 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Pro has 67 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper