Model comparison
Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3.5-Flash
Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.7 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3 Pro leads 64.3 to 43.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 92.6% for Gemini 3 Pro and 82.3% for Qwen3.5-Flash.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 54.7 | 42.3 |
| Released | 2025-11-18 | 2026-02-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 67 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 52.1 (#33), Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.9 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | 1243 |
| LMArena Coding | 1482 | 1412 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,177 | 221.8 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.9% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 74.2% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 68.7% | — |
| GSO | 18.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 69.9% | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.83 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3 Pro: 40.5 (#21), Qwen3.5-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,478 | 462.69 |
| Terminal-Bench | 69.4% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 72.5% | — |
| GDPval | 40.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 1.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 80.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 18% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 75.9% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 46.3% | — |
| BALROG | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1207 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 71% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 52.5 (#28), Qwen3.5-Flash: 32.9 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 31% | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1404 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.96 | 143.98 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 31.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 94.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 75% | — |
| CritPt | 6.9% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| ForecastBench | 61.2 | — |
Math Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 48.8 (#50), Qwen3.5-Flash: 36.3 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.4% | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 37.6% | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 18.8% | 0% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67% | — |
| ProofBench | 20% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 55.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 64.3 (#15), Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.6% | 82.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.6% | 10.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1475 | 1408 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 37.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 90.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3 Pro: 56.9 (#1), Qwen3.5-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1305 | — |
| GeoBench | 84% | — |
| VPCT | 91% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1434 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 57.1 (#14), Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.7 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1522 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1492 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1517 | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1513 | 1369 |
| LMArena Korean | 1449 | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | 1493 | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1468 | 1399 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 76.4 (#42), Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1458 | 1374 |
| IFEval | 87.7% | — |
Long Context Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 44.0 (#75), Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1472 | 1392 |
| CL-bench | 15.8% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gemini 3 Pro: 66.6 (#34), Qwen3.5-Flash: 58.2 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1479 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1484 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1525 | — |
| WildBench | 85.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Pro better than Qwen3.5-Flash?
Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.7 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?
Gemini 3 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.1 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3.5-Flash share?
27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Pro has 67 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.