Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 35.6.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1270 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1264 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1274 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1248 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1258 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1245 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.