Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 4 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 49.2 to 24.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is APEX-Agents: 82.2% for Gemini 4 Argon and 37.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 4 ArgonKimi K2.7 Code
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index56.543.3
Released2026-09-302026-06-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked2119

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena WebDev16781473
SciCode61.8%47.5%
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
FrontierSWE55%—
WeirdML—54.1%
LMArena Coding1550—
ALE-Bench—886.23

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents82.2%37.6%
Vending-Bench 213,7185,083
GBAEval—0.9%

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2.7 Code
CritPt27.1%10%
SimpleBench—57.9%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts1548—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.97

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench99%—
LMArena Math1536—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
LMArena Expert1553—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2.7 Code
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1523—
LMArena Chinese1610—
LMArena Russian1537—
LMArena Spanish1497—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Instruction Following1538—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1549—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1534—
LMArena Creative Writing1531—
LMArena Multi-Turn1557—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper