Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Llama 3.1-8B
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and Llama 3.1-8B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 10.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 61.8% for Gemini 4 Argon and 13.2% for Llama 3.1-8B.
- Llama 3.1-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Llama 3.1-8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 23.0 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2024-07-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.08 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Llama 3.1-8B: 20.2 (#340)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Llama 3.1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 61.8% | 13.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1195 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 1.7% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.5% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 62.8% |
| MBPP+ | — | 55.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Llama 3.1-8B: 22.5 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Llama 3.1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 25.8% |
| BALROG | — | 15.1% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Llama 3.1-8B: 14.9 (#321)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Llama 3.1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 27.1% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1175 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 50.9% |
| LMCA | — | 5.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 116.57 |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Llama 3.1-8B: 10.2 (#317)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Llama 3.1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1179 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.7% |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 13.7% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.9% |
| GSM8K | — | 82.4% |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Llama 3.1-8B: 8.0 (#307)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Llama 3.1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 40.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 24.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.8% |
| MMLU | — | 56.1% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Llama 3.1-8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Llama 3.1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Llama 3.1-8B: 34.0 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Llama 3.1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1148 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1151 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1158 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1169 |
| LMArena French | — | 1177 |
| LMArena German | — | 1144 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1053 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Llama 3.1-8B: 58.9 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Llama 3.1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1159 |
| IFEval | — | 74.3% |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Llama 3.1-8B: 35.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Llama 3.1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1182 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Llama 3.1-8B: 29.7 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Llama 3.1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1187 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1154 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1172 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 713 |
| WildBench | — | 68.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Llama 3.1-8B?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Llama 3.1-8B better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Llama 3.1-8B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-8B has 43.