Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 39.1.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 40.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1264 |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1461 |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Mistral Medium 3.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1436 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.35 |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1431 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1432 |
Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1223 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1442 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1409 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1385 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1415 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.