Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Mistral Small 3.2
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 26.3.
- Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.74 |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.