Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs o3
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 47.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and o3 in 2 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 50.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 27.1% for Gemini 4 Argon and 1.4% for o3.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | o3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 47.5 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2025-04-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 63 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), o3: 46.8 (#64)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1408 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 62.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 58.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 81.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| GSO | — | 8.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.4% |
| CadEval | — | 74% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 933.55 |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), o3: 34.5 (#44)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 30.8% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 45.2% |
| OSWorld | — | 23% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1144 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 65.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), o3: 32.0 (#78)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 27.1% | 1.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1402 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 6.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 53.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 60.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 13.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 84.8% |
| LMCA | — | 39.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.86 |
| ForecastBench | — | 62.5 |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), o3: 50.2 (#58)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1426 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 71.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 18.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge o3 leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), o3: 54.6 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1402 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 81.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 20.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 75.3% |
Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), o3: 41.4 (#36)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1214 |
| GeoBench | — | 74% |
| VPCT | — | 52% |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), o3: 51.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1401 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1406 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1395 |
| LMArena French | — | 1430 |
| LMArena German | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1370 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), o3: 72.8 (#127)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1368 |
| IFEval | — | 86.9% |
Long Context o3 leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), o3: 53.3 (#6)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 88.9% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.8% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), o3: 63.5 (#64)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1410 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1405 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1676 |
| WildBench | — | 86.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than o3?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 47.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or o3 better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 46.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and o3 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and o3 has 63.