Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs o3-pro
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 47.6.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $80 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.42 |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | — |
Long Context o3-pro leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than o3-pro?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or o3-pro better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 55.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and o3-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.