Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Phi-4 Mini

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Phi-4 Mini Microsoft

30.9

Rank #283 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 3 categories and Phi-4 Mini in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 62.0 to 28.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 61.8% for Gemini 4 Argon and 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini.
  • Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 4 Argon and Phi-4 Mini specifications
Gemini 4 ArgonPhi-4 Mini
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index56.530.9
Released2026-09-302024-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.075
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked213

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi-4 Mini
SciCode61.8%10.8%
LMArena WebDev1678—
FrontierSWE55%—
LMArena Coding1550—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Phi-4 Mini: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi-4 Mini
APEX-Agents82.2%—
Vending-Bench 213,718—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi-4 Mini
CritPt27.1%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1548—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Phi-4 Mini: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi-4 Mini
ProofBench99%—
LMArena Math1536—

Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi-4 Mini
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.5%
LMArena Expert1553—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Phi-4 Mini: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi-4 Mini
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Phi-4 Mini: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Non-English1523—
LMArena Chinese1610—
LMArena Russian1537—
LMArena Spanish1497—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Phi-4 Mini: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Instruction Following1538—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Phi-4 Mini: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Longer Query1549—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Phi-4 Mini: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Text1534—
LMArena Creative Writing1531—
LMArena Multi-Turn1557—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Phi-4 Mini?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Phi-4 Mini share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper