Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen1.5-32B
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 33.0.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 30.5 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1155 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen1.5-32B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1130 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1155 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1126 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen1.5-32B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1177 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1089 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1116 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen1.5-32B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.