Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 12.6.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 29.0 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.17 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.51 |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | — |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.