Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 40.1.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1487 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1483 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1474 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1489 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1534 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1470 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1467 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.