Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #182 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 39.0.

Side by side

Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.6 Flash specifications
Gemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6 Flash
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index56.538.8
Released2026-09-302026-04-27
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.19
Output $ / M tokens—$1.13
Results tracked2113

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena WebDev1678—
FrontierSWE55%—
SciCode61.8%—
LMArena Coding1550—
ALE-Bench—326.4

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6 Flash
APEX-Agents82.2%—
Vending-Bench 213,718—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6 Flash
SimpleBench—35.2%
CritPt27.1%—
Chess Puzzles—20%
LMArena Hard Prompts1548—
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—77.1%
LMCA—31%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.26

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—22.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
ProofBench99%—
LMArena Math1536—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—10.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6 Flash
GPQA Diamond—83.3%
SimpleQA Verified—15.9%
LMArena Expert1553—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6 Flash
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Non-English1523—
LMArena Chinese1610—
LMArena Russian1537—
LMArena Spanish1497—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1538—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1549—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Text1534—
LMArena Creative Writing1531—
LMArena Multi-Turn1557—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper