Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.7 Max

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 51.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 2 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 49.2 to 22.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 99% for Gemini 4 Argon and 26% for Qwen3.7 Max.

Side by side

Gemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Max
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index56.551.5
Released2026-09-302026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked2133

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Max
LMArena WebDev16781515
SciCode61.8%48.8%
LMArena Coding15501498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
FrontierSWE55%—
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Max
APEX-Agents82.2%—
GBAEval—0.4%
Vending-Bench 213,718—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Max
CritPt27.1%13.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts15481483
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.68

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Max
ProofBench99%26%
LMArena Math15361490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Expert15531488
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen3.7 Max: —

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Max
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English15231474
LMArena Chinese16101530
LMArena Russian15371484
LMArena Spanish1497—

Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following15381460

Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query15491482

Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text15341476
LMArena Creative Writing15311449
LMArena Multi-Turn15571481
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 51.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 50.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.7 Max share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper