Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Yi-34B

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 21.6.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 4 Argon and Yi-34B specifications
Gemini 4 ArgonYi-34B
ProviderGoogle01.AI
Noometry Index56.527.8
Released2026-09-302023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2123

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonYi-34B
LMArena Coding15501112
LMArena WebDev1678—
FrontierSWE55%—
SciCode61.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Yi-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonYi-34B
APEX-Agents82.2%—
Vending-Bench 213,718—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts15481104
CritPt27.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—117.39

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonYi-34B
LMArena Math15361114
ProofBench99%—
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonYi-34B
LMArena Expert15531061
GPQA Diamond—14.7%
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Yi-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonYi-34B
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonYi-34B
LMArena Non-English15231079
LMArena Chinese16101176
LMArena Russian15371050
LMArena Spanish14971070
LMArena French—1081
LMArena German—1042
LMArena Japanese—993
LMArena Korean—959

Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following15381091

Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query15491094

Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonYi-34B
LMArena Text15341129
LMArena Creative Writing15311108
LMArena Multi-Turn15571113

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Yi-34B?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or Yi-34B better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Yi-34B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper