Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 3 32b Think in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.0 (#202), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1318 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 23.6 (#163), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1302 |
Math Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.9 (#181), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1315 |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.7 (#201), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1272 |
Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.8 (#187), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1306 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.2 (#206), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1275 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#202), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1254 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.8 (#195), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.