Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Gemma 7B
Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Gemma 7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 7B in 8 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 30.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1048 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | 43.4% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1042 |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.99 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1066 |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1001 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1035 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 993 |
| LMArena French | — | 1025 |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1017 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1022 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 963 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Gemma 7B?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Gemma 7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.3 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Gemma 7B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (30.1 vs 30.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Gemma 7B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.