Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Mistral Small 3
Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Small 3 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Mistral Small 3 leads 63.9 to 50.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 30.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-01-30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.08 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Small 3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Mistral Small 3: 36.0 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1246 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 50.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Mistral Small 3: 18.2 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1233 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 127.06 |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Mistral Small 3: 15.3 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1240 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.7% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Mistral Small 3: 25.0 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1202 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 25.2% |
Multilingual Mistral Small 3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Mistral Small 3: 37.5 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1198 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1204 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1211 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1188 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1216 |
| LMArena French | — | 1202 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
Instruction Following Mistral Small 3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Mistral Small 3: 63.9 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1214 |
Long Context Mistral Small 3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1246 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Mistral Small 3: 32.4 (#275)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1234 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1195 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1217 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 707 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Mistral Small 3?
Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?
Mistral Small 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Mistral Small 3 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.