Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs GPT-4
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 3 categories and GPT-4 in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 32.0 to 10.8.
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 29.1 |
| Released | — | 2023-03-14 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 8K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), GPT-4: 31.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1254 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | 79.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 12.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 46% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 57.2% |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, GPT-4: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | — | 36.1% |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), GPT-4: 17.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1241 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 62.7% |
| LMCA | — | 17.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 75.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.89 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.8 |
| HellaSwag | — | 95.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.5% |
Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), GPT-4: 10.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1269 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 23% |
| GSM8K | — | 92% |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), GPT-4: 18.4 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1211 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.7% |
| MMLU | — | 86.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 84.8% |
Multilingual GPT-4 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), GPT-4: 40.6 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1246 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | 1283 |
| LMArena German | 1054 | 1251 |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | 1209 |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | 1184 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1251 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | 1261 |
Instruction Following GPT-4 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), GPT-4: 65.3 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1241 |
Long Context GPT-4 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), GPT-4: 37.7 (#212)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1244 |
Writing & Preference GPT-4 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), GPT-4: 34.9 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1257 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 752 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than GPT-4?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or GPT-4 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (31.5 vs 31.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and GPT-4 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4 has 38.