Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs GPT-5.4 Pro
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 20.5.
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.4 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 58.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $180 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 57.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 74.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 94.5% |
| CritPt | — | 30% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 58.6% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 23.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 158.93 |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 82.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 58.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1107 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 50% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 37.5% |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 94.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 44.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 46.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 8.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena French | 1065 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), GPT-5.4 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than GPT-5.4 Pro?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or GPT-5.4 Pro better for coding?
GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and GPT-5.4 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 Pro has 16.