Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Phi-4
Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Phi-4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Phi-4 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 32.0 to 20.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 31.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.07 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi-4 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1231 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 30.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.8% |
| BALROG | — | 11.6% |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1220 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 47.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 45.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.42 |
| LiveBench | — | 41.6% |
Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1246 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 13.8% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 42% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 64.9% |
Knowledge Phi-4 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1203 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 29.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.7% |
| MMLU | — | 84.8% |
Multilingual Phi-4 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1197 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1212 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | 1224 |
| LMArena German | 1054 | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | 1158 |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | 1151 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1209 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | 1234 |
Instruction Following Phi-4 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1201 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.4% |
Long Context Phi-4 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1217 |
Writing & Preference Phi-4 leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1217 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1206 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 62.6% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 25.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Phi-4?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Phi-4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Phi-4 better for coding?
Phi-4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Phi-4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.