Model comparison
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 2B
Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 2B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 27B leads 44.2 to 24.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 2K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.65 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.65 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1010 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |
Reasoning Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | 989 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | 94.2 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |
Math Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1009 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 75.7% | 42.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |
Multilingual Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 937 |
| LMArena French | 1247 | — |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 970 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |
Long Context Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 981 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 987 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 945 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 27B better than Gemma 2B?
Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 2 27B or Gemma 2B better for coding?
Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.